logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Feb 23 07:06:38 GMT 2014

Hi Carlos,

thanks for reporting this. I fixed a bug in splitter with r316, see 
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/listing.php?repname=splitter

You might still see warnings from mkgmap for lacking ways in restriction
relations
if you style doesn't assign a routable type for the to-way or from-way.
See point 4 in this post:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-turn-restriction-tp5795049p5795209.html

Gerd


Carlos Dávila-2 wrote
> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/splitter.log
> 
> El 22/02/14 11:33, GerdP escribió:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> the problem seems to be in splitter, as the to-way is really missing in
>> the
>> file
>> 55114002.osm.pbf. I'll try to reproduce that.
>> Please post your splitter log file.
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>
>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote
>>> Relation 1610018 is reported to lack "to" way for tile
>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.img while it is fully
>>> contained in tile http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.img
>>> Source files are available at
>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.osm.pbf and
>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.osm.pbf
>>>
>>> El 22/02/14 08:49, Gerd Petermann escribió:
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>
>>>> I was not able to reproduce the problem.
>>>> Please post a link to a tile for that mkgmap produces wrong messages.
>>>>
>>>> Gerd
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:31:19 +0100
>>>>> From:
>>> cdavilam@
>>>>> To:
>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> El 21/02/14 20:57, GerdP escribió:
>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you say that you see the message for the turn restriction in mkgmap.
>>>>> Right
>>>>>> If one of the ways of relation 1610018 crosses the tile border,
>>>>>> splitter will write all members of the relation to both tiles, but it
>>>>>> is only usable in the tile that contains the via point.
>>>>> Restrictions are correctly processed when a route is calculated, no
>>>>> problem there. The warning is not reported for the tile that contains
>>>>> the restriction (or the via point), but for the neighbor one. Would it
>>>>> be possible to detect that a restriction is fully contained in given
>>>>> tile and avoid such warnings in the neighbor one?
>>>>> The main concerns are the waste of time trying to fix restrictions
>>>>> reported by mkgmap that are correct in OSM and the bad experience of
>>>>> people who download errors files from my site and faces a list full of
>>>>> false errors, which for sure will dis encourage them to continue
>>>> working
>>>>> on their fix.
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote
>>>>>>> Not sure what you mean. See attached screenshot for relation
>>>> 1610018.
>>>>>>> It's placed on the crossing below label "CL-501". Tile border is the
>>>>>>> vertical gray line on the left, so some 800 meters. overlap=auto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El 21/02/14 19:31, GerdP escribió:
>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is the via point within the tile border? If not, it should be
>>>> ignored.
>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>> Some of the turn restriction warnings reported by mkgmap are
>>>> correctly
>>>>>>>>> mapped in OSM. They all seem to be near tile borders. Shouldn't
>>>>>>>>> keep-complete option of splitter take care of these relations?
>>>>>>>>> If you want to check some of these relations, here is the list I
>>>>>>>>> currently get processing a customized spain.osm.pbf file (I can
>>>> supply
>>>>>>>>> the file if necessary) (max-nodes=2100000):
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1610018
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556829
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556828
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619758
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619754
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619760
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874949
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1471323
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2733411
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553991
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553985
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1554001
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3499015
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874952
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874950
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3121764
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2512039
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3328204
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395687
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395691
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395685
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009483
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009481
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3497275
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2074869
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3103660
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694535
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694528
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694526
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694533
>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction
>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3526934
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MapSource.png (7K)
>>>>>>>
>>>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5797034/0/MapSource.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797041.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797097.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797146.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list