[mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Feb 23 07:06:38 GMT 2014
Hi Carlos, thanks for reporting this. I fixed a bug in splitter with r316, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/listing.php?repname=splitter You might still see warnings from mkgmap for lacking ways in restriction relations if you style doesn't assign a routable type for the to-way or from-way. See point 4 in this post: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-turn-restriction-tp5795049p5795209.html Gerd Carlos Dávila-2 wrote > http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/splitter.log > > El 22/02/14 11:33, GerdP escribió: >> Hi Carlos, >> >> the problem seems to be in splitter, as the to-way is really missing in >> the >> file >> 55114002.osm.pbf. I'll try to reproduce that. >> Please post your splitter log file. >> >> Gerd >> >> >> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>> Relation 1610018 is reported to lack "to" way for tile >>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.img while it is fully >>> contained in tile http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.img >>> Source files are available at >>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.osm.pbf and >>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.osm.pbf >>> >>> El 22/02/14 08:49, Gerd Petermann escribió: >>>> Hi Carlos, >>>> >>>> I was not able to reproduce the problem. >>>> Please post a link to a tile for that mkgmap produces wrong messages. >>>> >>>> Gerd >>>> >>>>> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:31:19 +0100 >>>>> From: >>> cdavilam@ >>>>> To: >>> mkgmap-dev at .org >>>>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El 21/02/14 20:57, GerdP escribió: >>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>> >>>>>> you say that you see the message for the turn restriction in mkgmap. >>>>> Right >>>>>> If one of the ways of relation 1610018 crosses the tile border, >>>>>> splitter will write all members of the relation to both tiles, but it >>>>>> is only usable in the tile that contains the via point. >>>>> Restrictions are correctly processed when a route is calculated, no >>>>> problem there. The warning is not reported for the tile that contains >>>>> the restriction (or the via point), but for the neighbor one. Would it >>>>> be possible to detect that a restriction is fully contained in given >>>>> tile and avoid such warnings in the neighbor one? >>>>> The main concerns are the waste of time trying to fix restrictions >>>>> reported by mkgmap that are correct in OSM and the bad experience of >>>>> people who download errors files from my site and faces a list full of >>>>> false errors, which for sure will dis encourage them to continue >>>> working >>>>> on their fix. >>>>> Carlos >>>>>> Gerd >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>>>>>> Not sure what you mean. See attached screenshot for relation >>>> 1610018. >>>>>>> It's placed on the crossing below label "CL-501". Tile border is the >>>>>>> vertical gray line on the left, so some 800 meters. overlap=auto >>>>>>> >>>>>>> El 21/02/14 19:31, GerdP escribió: >>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is the via point within the tile border? If not, it should be >>>> ignored. >>>>>>>> Gerd >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>>>>>>>> Some of the turn restriction warnings reported by mkgmap are >>>> correctly >>>>>>>>> mapped in OSM. They all seem to be near tile borders. Shouldn't >>>>>>>>> keep-complete option of splitter take care of these relations? >>>>>>>>> If you want to check some of these relations, here is the list I >>>>>>>>> currently get processing a customized spain.osm.pbf file (I can >>>> supply >>>>>>>>> the file if necessary) (max-nodes=2100000): >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1610018 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556829 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556828 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619758 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619754 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619760 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874949 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1471323 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2733411 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553991 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553985 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1554001 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3499015 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874952 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874950 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3121764 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2512039 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3328204 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395687 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395691 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395685 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009483 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009481 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3497275 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2074869 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3103660 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694535 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694528 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694526 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694533 >>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3526934 >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org >>>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MapSource.png (7K) >>>>>>> >>>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5797034/0/MapSource.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797041.html >>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797097.html >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797146.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list