[mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
From Carlos Dávila cdavilam at orangecorreo.es on Sun Feb 23 15:30:49 GMT 2014
El 23/02/14 08:06, GerdP escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > thanks for reporting this. I fixed a bug in splitter with r316, see > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/listing.php?repname=splitter Thank you for fixing it. > > You might still see warnings from mkgmap for lacking ways in restriction > relations > if you style doesn't assign a routable type for the to-way or from-way. > See point 4 in this post: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-turn-restriction-tp5795049p5795209.html I think processing turn restrictions for non routable ways doesn't make much sense. If the problem is that the ways have not tags of incomplete tags, as those mentioned in the post above, it's good to get the warning, so that data can be fixed. > > Gerd > > > Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/splitter.log >> >> El 22/02/14 11:33, GerdP escribió: >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> the problem seems to be in splitter, as the to-way is really missing in >>> the >>> file >>> 55114002.osm.pbf. I'll try to reproduce that. >>> Please post your splitter log file. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> >>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>>> Relation 1610018 is reported to lack "to" way for tile >>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.img while it is fully >>>> contained in tile http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.img >>>> Source files are available at >>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114002.osm.pbf and >>>> http://mapas.alternativaslibres.es/55114011.osm.pbf >>>> >>>> El 22/02/14 08:49, Gerd Petermann escribió: >>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>> >>>>> I was not able to reproduce the problem. >>>>> Please post a link to a tile for that mkgmap produces wrong messages. >>>>> >>>>> Gerd >>>>> >>>>>> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:31:19 +0100 >>>>>> From: >>>> cdavilam@ >>>>>> To: >>>> mkgmap-dev at .org >>>>>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> El 21/02/14 20:57, GerdP escribió: >>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you say that you see the message for the turn restriction in mkgmap. >>>>>> Right >>>>>>> If one of the ways of relation 1610018 crosses the tile border, >>>>>>> splitter will write all members of the relation to both tiles, but it >>>>>>> is only usable in the tile that contains the via point. >>>>>> Restrictions are correctly processed when a route is calculated, no >>>>>> problem there. The warning is not reported for the tile that contains >>>>>> the restriction (or the via point), but for the neighbor one. Would it >>>>>> be possible to detect that a restriction is fully contained in given >>>>>> tile and avoid such warnings in the neighbor one? >>>>>> The main concerns are the waste of time trying to fix restrictions >>>>>> reported by mkgmap that are correct in OSM and the bad experience of >>>>>> people who download errors files from my site and faces a list full of >>>>>> false errors, which for sure will dis encourage them to continue >>>>> working >>>>>> on their fix. >>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>> Gerd >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>>>>>>> Not sure what you mean. See attached screenshot for relation >>>>> 1610018. >>>>>>>> It's placed on the crossing below label "CL-501". Tile border is the >>>>>>>> vertical gray line on the left, so some 800 meters. overlap=auto >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El 21/02/14 19:31, GerdP escribió: >>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> is the via point within the tile border? If not, it should be >>>>> ignored. >>>>>>>>> Gerd >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carlos Dávila-2 wrote >>>>>>>>>> Some of the turn restriction warnings reported by mkgmap are >>>>> correctly >>>>>>>>>> mapped in OSM. They all seem to be near tile borders. Shouldn't >>>>>>>>>> keep-complete option of splitter take care of these relations? >>>>>>>>>> If you want to check some of these relations, here is the list I >>>>>>>>>> currently get processing a customized spain.osm.pbf file (I can >>>>> supply >>>>>>>>>> the file if necessary) (max-nodes=2100000): >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1610018 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556829 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2556828 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619758 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619754 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1619760 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874949 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1471323 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2733411 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553991 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1553985 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1554001 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3499015 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874952 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1874950 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3121764 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2512039 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3328204 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395687 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395691 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3395685 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009483 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3009481 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3497275 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2074869 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3103660 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694535 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694528 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694526 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1694533 >>>>>>>>>> Turn restriction >>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3526934 >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org >>>>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MapSource.png (7K) >>>>>>>> >>>>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5797034/0/MapSource.png> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797041.html >>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Wrong-turn-restriction-warnings-tp5797029p5797097.html >>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Wrong turn restriction warnings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list