[mkgmap-dev] special cases in restriction relations, r3178 still not perfect
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Fri Apr 11 13:49:05 BST 2014
Hi Andrzej, popej wrote > Hi Gerd, > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1626132 > > It looks like there is a road sign directly described by restriction. > Car drivers probably don't have doubts, where is "straight on". I think > tagging of this example is acceptable. Sure, the car driver always has to make sure that the route is allowed, but I think we want to avoid to calculate (and show) a route that is not allowed.Only, for this very special case it would probably require many lines of code to find out which way is correct. It already required many lines to detect the special case ;-) I'd prefer to change the wiki and say that this case must be avoided. Maybe one of the OSM experts is willing to start a discussion about that in the tagging list? popej wrote > When you find ambiguity in via sequence you could compute angle between > via roads to find which one fits descriptions like left, right or > straight. Well, okay, maybe I'll add the code to check that e.g. for a no_left_turn really the to-way describes a left turn. Probably mkgmap should ignore the restriction if that is not the case. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/special-cases-in-restriction-relations-r3178-still-not-perfect-tp5802962p5802978.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] special cases in restriction relations, r3178 still not perfect
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] special cases in restriction relations, r3178 still not perfect
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list