[mkgmap-dev] Rendering Tunnels

Tue Oct 21 13:13:02 BST 2014

I'll give a try with your proposal,  I believe it might fix the routing
however if I got it right, tunnels will not be visible as per my 1st email
attempt.

On the other side, related to your comment* "with your latest rules,
secondary highway with tunnel finishes processing of this object*", I
believe this was my intention: up to res 21 I'd like the line to appear as
0x04, from resolution 22 it should appear as 0x11 if a tunnel, otherwise
0x04 - no further processing is needed. Could you pls let me know why the
reasoning is not correct?

Thanks!

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Andrzej Popowski <popej at poczta.onet.pl>
wrote:

> Hi Enrico,
>
> with your latest rules, secondary highway with tunnel finishes processing
> of this object. Try this:
>
> highway=secondary & ( network=e-road | int_ref=* ) [0x04 resolution 18-19
> continue]
> highway=secondary & tunnel=yes [0x11 resolution 22 continue]
> highway=secondary  [0x04 road_class=2 road_speed=3 resolution 20]
>
> Don't make tunnels routable, since you will get 2 routable roads at the
> same place, which probably is not needed, unless you add different
> avoidances to each. Probably would be better to use a line outside routable
> lines (not lines 0x01 - 0x13).
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20141021/0f41ff53/attachment.html>