[mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the r3602

Tue Jul 21 10:21:00 BST 2015

Hi Alexandre,

I think the problem here is that you have two ways named "RUA PORTO ALEGRE",
one with id 2, the other with id 46, and both are in the same city.
So far no problem, but the addr:interpolation ways on those two roads
also produce a bunch of duplicate numbers. 
As a result, the new algo decides to ignore them.
Unfortunately, the log 
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 2(0) 2(1)
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 3(0) 3(1)
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13 800..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14 801..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 419..205, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 203..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 418..204, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 202..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: found problems with interpolated numbers from addr:interpolations ways for roads with name RUA PORTO ALEGRE

is not very clear about the reason and the final action, but I think the data is not okay and the algo is correct
to ignore it.

What do you think?
Gerd

Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:04 -0300
From: alexandre.loss at gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
CC: Adm_Tec_Tracksource at googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the	r3602

Hi Andrzej,
Ok, thank you for your time and analyses.Lets wait for Gerd.

regards,Alexandre

2015-06-17 13:13 GMT-03:00 Andrzej Popowski <popej at poczta.onet.pl>:
Hi Alexandre,

I confirm, that there is no address on your map with current mkgmap. Data seems to be OK, so lets wait for Gerd opinion.

-- 

Best regards,

Andrzej

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150721/32937ae6/attachment.html>