[mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the r3602

Tue Jul 21 13:06:58 BST 2015

Hi Gerd and Steve,

Thanks by your attention.
I'm in vocation now and without access to my computer, so I can't provide more information if you need till my return in beginning of August.
But I think that the data is correct because in despite the streets have the same name, they are different road since they aren't connect (there is a gap / a block between them).
So I believe that the algo couldn't consider the name of street.
But I understand your point of view, since it looks that can have a number overlapping/shadow of both streets, what would be a logical error.

Unfortunately, I can make more  test these days but as soon I come back I will.

Thanks, 

Alexandre

(Enviado via iPad)

> Em 21/07/2015, às 06:21, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> I think the problem here is that you have two ways named "RUA PORTO ALEGRE",
> one with id 2, the other with id 46, and both are in the same city.
> So far no problem, but the addr:interpolation ways on those two roads
> also produce a bunch of duplicate numbers. 
> As a result, the new algo decides to ignore them.
> Unfortunately, the log 
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 2(0) 2(1)
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 3(0) 3(1)
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13 800..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14 801..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 419..205, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 203..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 418..204, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 202..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: found problems with interpolated numbers from addr:interpolations ways for roads with name RUA PORTO ALEGRE
> 
> 
> is not very clear about the reason and the final action, but I think the data is not okay and the algo is correct
> to ignore it.
> 
> What do you think?
> Gerd
> 
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:04 -0300
> From: alexandre.loss at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> CC: Adm_Tec_Tracksource at googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the	r3602
> 
> Hi Andrzej,
> 
> Ok, thank you for your time and analyses.
> Lets wait for Gerd.
> 
> regards,
> Alexandre
> 
> 
> 2015-06-17 13:13 GMT-03:00 Andrzej Popowski <popej at poczta.onet.pl>:
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> I confirm, that there is no address on your map with current mkgmap. Data seems to be OK, so lets wait for Gerd opinion.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Andrzej
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150721/a0605d9e/attachment.html>