[mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

Thu Oct 22 20:30:20 BST 2015

Hi Gerd,

Thanks for the explanation (again) and for the new patch. This approach is
probably better considering the concerns about v1. Perhaps you can add a
comment about this new rule above the highway=construction statement in the
lines file. That way people will be able to find the special handling when
reading the lines file.

Thanks, Ben

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Gerd Petermann <
GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
>
> attached is my version of your approach. It adds the rule
>
> # Don't route through highway=construction, they are considered unusable
> highway=construction {setaccess no}
>
> at the very end of inc/access.
>
> This should work, but splits the special handling of highway=construction.
>
>
> Gerd
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Von:* mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <
> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <
> ben at bagu.org>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28
> *An:* Development list for mkgmap
> *Betreff:* Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the
> highway=construction ways
>
> For people who have issues with Gerd's implement (line is in NET but not
> in NOD): What do you think about my original suggestion of adding
> "setaccess 'no';" to highway=construction?
>
> Thanks, Ben
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Gerd Petermann <
> GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>> glad to see that you did not use the mkgmap: prefix ;-)
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <
>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von chris66 <
>> chris66nrw at gmx.de>
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52
>> An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the
>> highway=construction       ways
>>
>> Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
>> > I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.
>>
>> I used this tag already in OSM to mark isolated ways. :-)
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111674198#map=18/54.3354/8.5915
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20151022/a5567bdc/attachment.html>