[mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

Fri Oct 23 14:01:19 BST 2015

Hi Ben,

okay, I've added a comment, see attached v3.

if I hear no complains I'll commit this patch next monday.

Gerd

________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <ben at bagu.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015 21:30
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

Hi Gerd,

Thanks for the explanation (again) and for the new patch. This approach is probably better considering the concerns about v1. Perhaps you can add a comment about this new rule above the highway=construction statement in the lines file. That way people will be able to find the special handling when reading the lines file.

Thanks, Ben

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Ben,

attached is my version of your approach. It adds the rule

# Don't route through highway=construction, they are considered unusable
highway=construction {setaccess no}

at the very end of inc/access.

This should work, but splits the special handling of highway=construction.

Gerd

________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <ben at bagu.org<mailto:ben at bagu.org>>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways

For people who have issues with Gerd's implement (line is in NET but not in NOD): What do you think about my original suggestion of adding "setaccess 'no';" to highway=construction?

Thanks, Ben

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Gerd Petermann <GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Chris,
glad to see that you did not use the mkgmap: prefix ;-)

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von chris66 <chris66nrw at gmx.de<mailto:chris66nrw at gmx.de>>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52
An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction       ways

Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss:
> I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear.

I used this tag already in OSM to mark isolated ways. :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111674198#map=18/54.3354/8.5915

Chris

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20151023/43162364/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: construction_v3.patch
Type: application/x-download
Size: 1118 bytes
Desc: construction_v3.patch
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20151023/43162364/attachment.bin>