[mkgmap-dev] Commit r4715: rework of options for reverse merge

Sat May 15 15:53:45 BST 2021

I think the important question is if the oneway tag should be evaluated for non-routable lines.
Felix already said no, I agree with that.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Mai 2021 16:04
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4715: rework of options for reverse merge

Assuming that the output device shows the direction on lines with
direction and doesn't on lines without:

Another example is, say, [intermittent] water using type [0x26] 0x1f.
stream/river will have a direction and canal/ditch won't.

There will be others, under the control of the Style/TYP, so I don't
think mkgmap should check/warn of this situation.

Ticker

On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 12:59 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> I only thought about non-routable lines and LineMerger. For roads it
> is normal to have different flags because of the oneway tag.
> Maybe I make too many assumptions about the possible usage of
> types...
>
> Gerd

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev