[mkgmap-dev] Commit r4715: rework of options for reverse merge

Sat May 15 16:38:26 BST 2021

I agree. The style can test "oneway" and set mkgmap:has-direction if
appropriate for non-roads.

Ticker

On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 14:53 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> I think the important question is if the oneway tag should be
> evaluated for non-routable lines.
> Felix already said no, I agree with that.
> 
> Gerd
> 
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Mai 2021 16:04
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4715: rework of options for reverse
> merge
> 
> Assuming that the output device shows the direction on lines with
> direction and doesn't on lines without:
> 
> Another example is, say, [intermittent] water using type [0x26] 0x1f.
> stream/river will have a direction and canal/ditch won't.
> 
> There will be others, under the control of the Style/TYP, so I don't
> think mkgmap should check/warn of this situation.
> 
> Ticker
> 
> On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 12:59 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > I only thought about non-routable lines and LineMerger. For roads
> > it
> > is normal to have different flags because of the oneway tag.
> > Maybe I make too many assumptions about the possible usage of
> > types...
> > 
> > Gerd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev